Markets ยท Three ways to decide

The PGIQ Ratings: 84 rated market and regional views, scored and ranked

Search a market to open its full rating: the tier, the five pillars behind it, its recurring cost band, its connection wait, live grid conditions, and every dated rating action. Build, sell, plan and monitor are different decisions, and each has its own read of the same underlying evidence. Any one market is free, numbers included. All 84 side by side is the Analyst Desk.

The same market, read four ways: build, sell, plan, monitor
BuildSellPlan
Monitor →
Compare markets โ†’
Tier 1 PrimeStrongest fundamentalsTier 2 StrongStrong, with known trade-offsTier 3 WorkableViable, with conditionsTier 4 ConstrainedPossible, but expect frictionTier 5 Largely closedNot currently practical for new large load
1
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden North (Lulea, SE1/SE2)
● Tier 1 Prime ยท Positive ยท High conf
1
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates
Tier 1 Prime ยท Positive ยท Med conf
โ— Under review
1
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden
Tier 1 Prime ยท Stable ยท High conf
1
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway
● Tier 1 Prime ยท Stable ยท High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas)
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท High conf
โ— Under review
2
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT Central (Houston & DFW)
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ British Columbia
Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Manitoba
Tier 2 Strong ยท Stable ยท High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Pacific Northwest
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Negative ยท High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Desert Southwest (Phoenix)
Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med-High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med-High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia
Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med conf
2
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT West (West Texas & Panhandle)
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med-High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med-High conf
โ— Under review
2
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil (Sao Paulo)
Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Low conf
2
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US Southeast (Atlanta)
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med conf
2
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ontario
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Negative ยท High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ SPP (Southwest Power Pool)
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med conf
2
๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar
Tier 2 Strong ยท Stable ยท Med conf
2
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Alberta
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med-High conf
2
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med conf
2
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ MISO (Midwest)
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med conf
2
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal
Tier 2 Strong ยท Positive ยท Med conf
2
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM)
● Tier 2 Strong ยท Negative ยท High conf
โ— Under review
3
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Newfoundland & Labrador
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany North (Hamburg)
● Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med-High conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Low conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Low conf
3
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden South (Malmo, SE4)
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท High conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia
● Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand
● Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท High conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea
● Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med-High conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkey
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan West (Osaka, 60Hz)
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia (NEM)
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med-High conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia NSW (Sydney)
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med-High conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia Queensland (Brisbane)
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ New Brunswick
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท High conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Low conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia
● Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ CAISO (California)
● Tier 3 Workable ยท Negative ยท High conf
โ— Under review
3
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czech Republic
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NYISO (New York)
● Tier 3 Workable ยท Negative ยท High conf
โ— Under review
3
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ISO New England
● Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท High conf
โ— Under review
3
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy (Milan, North)
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan
Tier 3 Workable ยท Positive ยท Med conf
3
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel
Tier 3 Workable ยท Stable ยท Low conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia Victoria (Melbourne)
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med-High conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med-High conf
4
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saskatchewan
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Positive ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany South (Frankfurt/Munich)
● Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med-High conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Low conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain
● Tier 4 Constrained ยท Positive ยท High conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan East (Tokyo, 50Hz)
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands
● Tier 4 Constrained ยท Negative ยท High conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Positive ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Nova Scotia
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท High conf
4
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท Med conf
4
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore
Tier 4 Constrained ยท Stable ยท High conf
5
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland (Dublin)
● Tier 5 Largely closed ยท Positive ยท High conf
โ— Under review
No market matches that. Try a country, region, or city name.
Click any market for its full read. 84 markets and sub-regions, of which 79 are independently rated; the 5 country pages (such as ERCOT (Texas)) roll up their regional ratings. Reviewed on a schedule and whenever a significant event occurs.
๐Ÿ”” Get rating-change alerts
Be notified when a market's PGIQ Rating, outlook or a material development changes. Free while we validate demand.

Latest developments across all markets

Churchill Falls and Gull Island agreement replaces the 1969 contract; 14,000 MW targeted, up to 2,350 MW retained in provinceNON-BINDING๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Newfoundland & Labrador โ†’
Aug 2026AvailabilityMateriality: high

Announced 17 Aug 2026 in St. John's by the Prime Minister with the premiers of Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec. The agreements terminate the 1969 Churchill Falls power contract, under which Hydro-Quebec bought the output at 0.2 cents per kWh, and replace the December 2024 MOU. Federal financing of $10 billion supports Churchill Falls upgrades, developing Gull Island, co-investment with the Innu of Labrador in a 2,000 MW Labrador onshore wind project, and associated transmission. Ottawa puts the combined projects at nearly $70 billion and 14,000 MW, nearly tripling Churchill Falls capacity, supporting 23,000 construction-phase jobs and $31 billion of GDP through the early 2040s. Newfoundland and Labrador retains up to 2,350 MW against 1,990 MW under the 2024 MOU, plus 400 MW of the wind project's output, and a guaranteed 985 MW transmission portfolio into New York, New England and Ontario markets. Provincial benefit is stated at $49 billion (2026 NPV) against $36 billion. TWO QUALIFIERS THE HEADLINE NUMBER DOES NOT CARRY: the agreement is non-binding, with definitive agreements targeted by end-2026, and the Churchill Falls expansion itself (CFX) was removed from it, leaving a feasibility study with no commercial arrangements in place. The near-term physical change for a load siting in this province is the Labrador West transmission line, not the 14,000 MW.

Power to a buyer: Nothing before the 2030s. Ottawa's own GDP timeline runs to the early 2040s; the near-term item is the Labrador West transmission line, not the 14,000 MW.
Source: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador โ†—
Quebec secures long-term Churchill Falls and Gull Island supply as the 1969 contract is terminatedNON-BINDING๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec โ†’
Aug 2026AvailabilityMateriality: high

The 17 Aug 2026 agreements end the 1969 power contract, under which Hydro-Quebec bought Churchill Falls output at 0.2 cents per kWh, and replace the December 2024 MOU. Hydro-Quebec continues to take Churchill Falls and Gull Island power under new commercial terms and participates in the Churchill Falls expansion, Gull Island and the associated transmission build. Premier Frรฉchette framed the agreement as securing Quebec's energy independence and enabling growth through renewable energy. For a large load weighing Quebec, this is long-run supply certainty on a system whose access is authorization-gated and whose dedicated data-centre tariff is still before the Regie. The new pricing terms are not stated in the government releases and are not recorded here.

Power to a buyer: No change to what a Quebec load can connect to today. Access stays authorization-gated and the dedicated data-centre tariff is still before the Regie.
Source: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador โ†—
Labrador Trough corridor referred to the federal Major Projects Office to unlock mining loadANNOUNCED๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Newfoundland & Labrador โ†’
Aug 2026AccessMateriality: high

The federal government referred the Labrador Trough Clean Power, Critical Minerals and Infrastructure Corridor to the Major Projects Office, which coordinates federal financing and accelerates permitting. Pre-development funding under the First and Last Mile Fund covers a Labrador West transmission expansion to connect western Labrador mining operations to the grid, and planning work for the Kami iron ore project near Wabush. The province separately reports a $1 billion (2026 NPV) federal commitment to the Labrador West line. Lack of power has been the stated constraint on developing the region, so transmission is the binding item for any large industrial load there.

Power to a buyer: Pre-development funding only. The Labrador West line is the item that would let a new industrial load in western Labrador connect at all; it is committed on paper and unbuilt.
Source: Prime Minister of Canada โ†—
Churchill Falls expansion (CFX) removed from the agreement; feasibility study onlyANNOUNCED๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Newfoundland & Labrador โ†’
Aug 2026AvailabilityMateriality: med

VOCM reports that CFX, the expansion of the Churchill Falls generating station itself, has been taken out of the new agreement. A feasibility study will be completed but commercial arrangements are not in place. The 14,000 MW headline therefore rests on Gull Island, the 2,000 MW wind project and existing Churchill Falls capacity rather than on an expansion of the plant. Recorded separately from the announcement because the distinction between a committed project and a study is the whole question for anyone pricing future supply.

Power to a buyer: No capacity from CFX at any date. A feasibility study with no commercial arrangements is optionality, not supply.
Source: VOCM โ†—
PUCT hearing bounds the data center audit at 250 to 300 projects; ERCOT still targets April for Batch ZeroANNOUNCED๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas) โ†’
Aug 2026AccessMateriality: high

At a special PUCT open meeting on 14 Aug 2026, ERCOT officials said the verification audit ordered by Gov. Abbott covers about 250 to 300 projects representing roughly 200 GW of future demand, will take several months, and is confined to the Batch Zero study. ERCOT general counsel Chad Seely said the work was already planned as spot checks and has been moved to the front of the interconnection study process. ERCOT still aims to complete the first batch study by its original April deadline.

Power to a buyer: No new supply. This bounds a delay rather than adding capacity: a verification step covering 250 to 300 projects representing roughly 200 GW of requested demand, running several months, with ERCOT still targeting April for the Batch Zero study. The binding constraint is queue processing time.
Source: Texas Tribune โ†—
PJM files its large-load framework: Interim Resource Adequacy Service, a Large Load Registry, and curtailment ahead of paid demand responseANNOUNCED๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Aug 2026AccessMateriality: high

PJM filed with FERC on 13 Aug 2026 an Interim Resource Adequacy Service (IRAS) covering new Large Loads that neither bring their own capacity nor have it covered through the Reliability Backstop Procurement. In a supply emergency PJM would direct affected zones to reduce or transfer demand from those loads before calling on Load Management customers who are paid in advance to curtail, and before any action affecting residential consumers. PJM would build and maintain a Large Load Registry of all Large Loads, existing and new, and share it with states, utilities and regulators. From the 2029/2030 capacity auction, new Large Loads that bring no new supply would be excluded from the future need PJM procures against. PJM states that of 32 GW of forecast demand growth between 2024 and 2030, 30 GW is data centres. Retail cost allocation and load-reduction plans are left to the states, which is where the framework can stall. PJM asked FERC to accept within 60 days. This is a proposal, not a rule: it is unaccepted, and the six large-load Section 206 proceedings it sits alongside are still awaiting a Commission ruling on the abeyance requests filed in early August.

Power to a buyer: Nothing added to supply, and it can subtract from firm service. IRAS is a curtailment and registry regime, not generation. It changes nothing physically; if FERC accepts it within the requested 60 days, a new large load without its own capacity is first in line to be cut in an emergency, ahead of paid demand response.
Source: PJM Inside Lines โ†—
DOE cancels the last three proposed national transmission corridors, returning siting to the statesANNOUNCED๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ SPP (Southwest Power Pool) โ†’
Aug 2026AccessMateriality: low

Energy Secretary Chris Wright announced on 12 Aug 2026 that DOE will not designate the Lake Erie-Canada, Southwestern Grid Connector or Tribal Energy Access corridors, the three National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors carried forward from Dec 2024. The areas cover parts of Pennsylvania, Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota and Nebraska. None had been designated, so no existing federal backstop siting authority is withdrawn, but the route to one closes. The Federal Power Act still lets a future secretary restart the process.

Power to a buyer: No megawatts either way. All three corridors were proposals that were never designated, so no project loses a federal siting route it already had. What narrows is future optionality for long-haul transmission; the Federal Power Act still lets a later secretary restart the process.
Source: US Department of Energy โ†—
PJM opens a review of interconnection reliability rules for data centers after the 3.8 GW Virginia load tripANNOUNCED๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Aug 2026AccessMateriality: med

PJM said on 11 Aug 2026 it is evaluating changes to interconnection reliability requirements for computational loads including data centers and crypto mining, after roughly 3.8 GW of load tripped offline in Dominion's zone on 22 Jul 2026 following a 230 kV fault, the largest such event in PJM history. Candidate requirements cover voltage and frequency ride-through, on-site generation behaviour, and reconnection after disturbances. PJM restored its area control error within nine minutes against a 30 minute NERC requirement. Revises the earlier 3 GW figure for the same event.

Power to a buyer: No supply added or removed. If adopted, ride-through and reconnection requirements raise the engineering bar for connecting a large load in PJM rather than changing how much power exists to serve it.
Source: PJM Inside Lines โ†—
BNEF puts 49.8 GW, about 20 percent of the US data center pipeline, at risk of delay from the Texas pauseANNOUNCED๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas) โ†’
Aug 2026MomentumMateriality: med

BloombergNEF estimated on 5 Aug 2026 that the Texas interconnection pause exposes about 49.8 GW of data center projects, roughly 20% of the 253 GW US pipeline, with leasing revenue at risk of about $8 billion by 1Q 2027 on a 60% AI-compute mix and roughly $15 billion in a full-delay case. BNEF also forecasts about 8.25 GW of ERCOT data center additions through 2030. All figures are BNEF estimates, not measured outcomes.

Power to a buyer: Nothing is delivered or lost by an estimate. The 49.8 GW at risk and the $8bn to $15bn revenue exposure are BloombergNEF model outputs, not measured outcomes, and no capacity changes because of them.
Source: Utility Dive / BloombergNEF โ†—
Wisconsin regulators send the $1.4B line serving the Port Washington data center back to the start๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ MISO (Midwest) โ†’
Aug 2026AccessMateriality: med

The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin voted unanimously (6 Aug 2026) to rescind the completeness determination for American Transmission Company's roughly $1.4 billion 345 kV project, forcing a restart of the application after more than 550 design adjustments. Commissioners said the vote should not be read as a rejection of the project. ATC says it is the first such action in the PSC's 95 year history.

Source: Wisconsin Watch โ†—
Australia moves to make large data centres fund new renewables, contract firming and register as market participants๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia (NEM) โ†’
Aug 2026AccessMateriality: high

The AEMC delivered advice to the Energy and Climate Change Ministerial Council on 28 Jul 2026, released publicly 5 Aug 2026, recommending that data centres surrender REGO certificates from new additional generation, contract firm capacity, register as NEM market participants, and use connection agreements for flexibility and co-location. Ministers agreed to progress the framework; rule change requests go to the ECMC in Sep 2026 and federal legislation is targeted for early 2027. NSW separately introduced the Electricity Infrastructure Investment Amendment Bill 2026 on 5 Aug, giving the state minister REZ-style powers over grid access for loads of 5 MW or more and placing network costs on data centres rather than NSW customers.

Source: AEMC โ†—
Eskom passes 441 days without load-shedding and posts its best daily availability since 2017๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa โ†’
Aug 2026AvailabilityMateriality: low

Eskom reported (4 Aug 2026) 441 consecutive days without load-shedding, demand met 100% of the time from 1 Apr to 30 Jul 2026, and a daily energy availability factor of 82.04% on 26 Jul 2026, its highest since 2017. The winter outlook to 31 Aug 2026 continues to project no load-shedding. Updates the prior one year entry.

Source: SAnews / Eskom โ†—
All six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs and ISOs request abeyance in FERC's large-load proceedings๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Aug 2026AccessMateriality: med

Each of the six RTOs and ISOs, with their transmission owners, moved to hold its Section 206 show cause proceeding in abeyance: PJM on 28 Jul 2026 for 90 days (EL26-67), and SPP (EL26-68, 95 days), NYISO (EL26-69), MISO (EL26-70), CAISO (EL26-71) and ISO-NE (EL26-72) on 3 Aug 2026 for 90 days. The Commission set an answer period closing 7 Aug 2026. These are requests, not grants. Unless and until FERC rules on them the existing response deadlines stand. US wide in effect; keyed here because Northern Virginia is the largest affected concentration.

Source: Federal Register, FERC notice, Docket EL26-67-000 โ†—
Texas orders a verification step before any data center large load advances; ERCOT misses the Batch Zero classification date๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas) โ†’
Aug 2026AccessMateriality: high

ERCOT received a letter from Gov. Greg Abbott on 3 Aug 2026 directing it to conduct a verification process before advancing any data center Large Loads through interconnection. ERCOT confirmed it did not notify interconnecting TSPs and DSPs of Batch Zero classifications by the scheduled 7 Aug 2026 date, and will file a good cause exception request ahead of the PUCT open meeting on 20 Aug 2026. Duration and scope of the verification step are not yet defined.

Source: ERCOT market notice M-A080326-01 โ†—
Ofgem consults on a refundable data centre commitment fee to clear speculative projects from the queue๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain โ†’
Jul 2026AccessMateriality: high

Ofgem opened a consultation on 29 Jul 2026 proposing a Data Centre Commitment Fee for projects above 40 MW, set between GBP 237,500 and 712,500 per MW, roughly 2.5% to 7.5% of average project cost. A 500 MW project would need approximately GBP 119 million to 356 million of security. The fee is returned if the project proceeds to energisation and may be forfeited on termination or non-compliance, alongside data centre specific queue management milestones on credible end-user, long-lead equipment procurement, and financial and technical capability. It cuts both ways: it could improve access for viable projects by clearing a queue that grew from 41 GW to 125 GW between Nov 2024 and Jun 2025, of which about 73 GW is data centre demand, but it imposes a substantial financing and forfeiture burden on credible developers. Consultation closes 16 Sep 2026.

Source: Ofgem โ†—
Power ministry tells Parliament data centres may add 26.3 GW of load by FY32, nearly double the earlier estimate๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India โ†’
Jul 2026MomentumMateriality: med

The Ministry of Power told Parliament on 27 Jul 2026 that data centres may add 26.3 GW to the national grid by 2031-32, against an earlier estimate of 13.56 GW, based on projects reported by states. The ministry said the load would be served largely by renewable capacity and flagged grid balancing as the main concern given sharp load ramps.

Source: Business Standard / Ministry of Power โ†—
Ashburn line fault sends over 3 GW of data center load to backup power in seconds๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Jul 2026AvailabilityMateriality: high

A transmission line in Ashburn faulted and went out of service on 22 Jul 2026, after which data centers' own protection systems transferred them to backup generation. PJM reported more than 3 GW dropped off, about 3% of system demand at the time, producing a measurable frequency change but no reliability impact to the bulk power system. Dominion said no load was shed and that it did not disconnect the sites. A comparable 2024 Northern Virginia event was reported at about 1.5 GW. NERC is reviewing the event.

Source: Reuters โ†—
FERC orders NERC to write mandatory reliability standards for data center load integration๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Jul 2026AccessMateriality: med

In Docket RD26-7 (16 Jul 2026) FERC directed NERC to file one or more new or modified mandatory reliability standards governing the integration of computational loads by 31 Dec 2026, to propose registry criteria bringing computational load entities under the mandatory framework, and to file a Phase II work plan by 1 Mar 2027. US wide in effect; keyed here because Northern Virginia is the largest affected concentration.

Source: Willkie on FERC RD26-7 โ†—
New York imposes the first US statewide data-center moratorium by executive order๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NYISO (New York) โ†’
Jul 2026AccessMateriality: high

Gov. Hochul signed an executive order (14 Jul 2026) pausing environmental permits for data centers of 50 MW or more for up to one year while the state builds a regulatory framework covering energy, water and air impacts. The June legislature bill remains unsigned; the EO is in force now.

Source: Stateline โ†—
PJM capacity auction clears at the $325 cap again, 6.8 GW short of the reliability requirement๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Jul 2026CostMateriality: high

The 2028/29 Base Residual Auction (14 Jul 2026) procured 138,318 MW UCAP but cleared the footprint at the FERC-approved cap of $325/MW-day, 6,821 MW short of the reliability requirement, the second consecutive shortfall year.

Source: PJM Inside Lines โ†—
MISO declares a maximum generation emergency in its second July heat dome๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ MISO (Midwest) โ†’
Jul 2026AvailabilityMateriality: med

A dayslong heat dome over the Midwest drove demand to about 122 GW and MISO invoked maximum generation emergency procedures (15 Jul 2026), its second emergency of the month.

Source: RTO Insider โ†—
Alberta enacts its Data Centre Regulation; AESO's bring-your-own-generation process nears rollout๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Alberta โ†’
Jul 2026AccessMateriality: med

The Data Centre Regulation AR 117/2026 (9 Jun 2026) codifies BYOG, prioritizing large data centers that bring their own generation. AESO's proposed BYOG process closed feedback 13 Jul 2026, with rollout expected Aug 2026 and intakes about every nine months.

Source: Alberta Open Government โ†—
Virginia enacts the first US per-kWh data-center electricity tax at $0.011/kWh๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Jul 2026CostMateriality: high

The FY2026 budget imposes a consumption tax of $0.011/kWh on all electricity used by Virginia data centers from 1 Jul 2026, including behind-the-meter and self-generated supply, projected at about $600M a year. A structural cost adder in the world's largest market.

Source: Williams Mullen / VA HB30 โ†—
Regie hearing on the 13 cent data-centre tariff slips to fall 2026๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec โ†’
Jul 2026CostMateriality: low

The Regie de l'energie hearing on Hydro-Quebec's proposed ~13 c/kWh data-centre rate is now set for fall 2026, with a decision expected late 2026 or early 2027, later than the H2 2026 in-force date originally proposed.

Source: BLG โ†—
PUCT approves ERCOT's Batch Zero process for connecting large loads๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas) โ†’
Jun 2026AccessMateriality: med

The PUCT approved (18 Jun 2026) ERCOT's Batch Zero framework, which studies readiness-screened large loads in batches with a Jul 2026 cutoff for the 2028-2032 study. Formal regulatory sign-off on the readiness-tested queue.

Source: ERCOT / PUCT โ†—
MISO forecasts peak load up 35% to ~163 GW by 2035 on data centers๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ MISO (Midwest) โ†’
Apr 2026MomentumMateriality: med

MISO's long-term forecast (13 Apr 2026) sees peak load rising from 121 GW in 2025 to about 163 GW by 2035, led by data centers, with 8 to 14 GW of DC load expected online in 2026-2027. MISO flags high uncertainty and signs of right-sizing.

Source: Utility Dive / MISO โ†—
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Unit 6 restarts: TEPCO's first reactor back since 2011, 1,356 MWIN SERVICE๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan East (Tokyo, 50Hz) โ†’
Feb 2026AvailabilityMateriality: high

Japan restarted Unit 6 of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa, its largest nuclear station, on 9 Feb 2026, reaching full operation around mid-March. It is TEPCO's first reactor to resume after the post-2011 shutdowns, and adds roughly 9,500 GWh a year of firm, non-emitting generation to the 50Hz eastern system that Tokyo loads sit on. Japan now has 15 operating reactors totalling 33 GW. FOLLOW-THROUGH, NOT PROMISE: this one is delivering. The caution sits next door, where TEPCO has pushed Unit 7 (another 1,356 MW) back to 2029 or 2030, and where national policy assumes up to 30 reactors running by FY2040 against 15 today, 3 approved, 6 under review and 8 that have not applied.

Power to a buyer: Real electrons, now. 1,356 MW back on the TEPCO system since 9 Feb 2026, about 9,500 GWh a year. This is the rare case where the announcement and the delivery are the same event.
Source: US Energy Information Administration โ†—
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Unit 7 restart pushed to 2029-2030ANNOUNCED๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan East (Tokyo, 50Hz) โ†’
Feb 2026AvailabilityMateriality: med

TEPCO has delayed the restart of Unit 7, a second 1,356 MW reactor at the same station, to 2029 or 2030. Recorded separately from the Unit 6 restart because the two are routinely reported together as one recovery story, and they are not: one is generating and one is a date that has already moved. Japan's FY2040 policy target of about 20 per cent nuclear needs up to 30 reactors operating against 15 today.

Power to a buyer: Nothing before 2029 at the earliest, and only if the restart programme holds. Unit 7 is 1,356 MW deferred, not cancelled.
Source: US Energy Information Administration โ†—
Northern Virginia is the world's largest data-center market at ~4 GW, up ~37% in a year๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: high

Northern Virginia ended 2025 with roughly 4 GW of operating data-center capacity, up about 37% year on year and still the largest such market on earth, about 13% of global operational capacity. Demand keeps choosing the region despite the grid strain, an argument it may merit more than a middling tier, and a live test of whether access can keep pace.

Source: CBRE โ†—
DOE emergency order lets PJM curtail data centers as heat pushes demand near the record๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Jul 2026AvailabilityMateriality: high

A DOE 202(c) order (30 Jun 2026) authorizes PJM to direct curtailment of data centers and other large loads with backup generation as a last resort; the 2 Jul 2026 forecast peak of 166,241 MW approached the 2006 record of 165,563 MW and Pre-Emergency Demand Response was activated.

Source: PJM Inside Lines โ†—
Meta breaks ground on a CAD $13B, ~1 GW AI data center in Alberta, its first in Canada๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Alberta โ†’
Jul 2026MomentumMateriality: high

Meta began construction (Jul 2026) of a roughly 1 GW, CAD $13 billion AI-optimized data center in Sturgeon County, northeast of Edmonton, its first in Canada and 33rd worldwide, with the company reporting that it will match the site's electricity to clean and renewable supply. That is a procurement commitment, not a description of the physical grid mix. A build of this scale is concrete large-load momentum on the Alberta grid, and a live test of the interim connection framework.

Source: CBC News โ†—
FERC orders all six US RTOs to justify or reform large-load tariffs๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Jun 2026AccessMateriality: high

Section 206 show-cause orders (18 Jun 2026) preliminarily find each RTO/ISO tariff unjust and unreasonable for large-load integration; 60 days to respond (due 17 Aug 2026), covering study speed, cost allocation, co-location and behind-the-meter generation.

Source: FERC โ†—
ERCOT moves to readiness-tested large-load queue management as requests climb further๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas) โ†’
Jun 2026AccessMateriality: med

The large-load queue kept climbing through the first half of 2026, and ERCOT introduced evidence-based readiness screens (site control, permits, financing, equipment orders) to separate committed builds from speculative ones. A market disciplining a queue this large is one where large loads genuinely want to build, supporting the rating.

Source: Utility Dive โ†—
AESO interim large-load tranche fully allocated๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Alberta โ†’
Jun 2026AccessMateriality: med

Phase 1 closed on 12 Jun 2026 with all 1,200 MW of the interim data-centre connection limit allocated and contracted; a durable Phase 2 framework awaits Alberta's data-centre regulation.

Source: AESO โ†—
New York passes first US statewide data-centre moratorium (awaiting signature)๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NYISO (New York) โ†’
Jun 2026AccessMateriality: med

Legislature passed a one-year pause on permits for data centres of 20 MW or more (4 Jun 2026); not yet signed by the Governor. Would add environmental, efficiency and ratepayer conditions.

Source: NY Senate โ†—
NESO begins issuing Gate 2 connection offers for pre-2030 projects๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain โ†’
Jun 2026AccessMateriality: med

Under the TMO4+ reform, Gate 2 offers for applications up to 2030 are being issued by end-Jun 2026; NESO estimates ~13 GW of firm demand can connect before 2030, with ~86 GW more in 2030 to 2035.

Source: NESO โ†—
AEMO discloses a 5.4 GW data-centre connection queue๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia (NEM) โ†’
Jun 2026MomentumMateriality: med

First AEMO disclosure (Jun 2026) shows 11 data-centre projects totalling 5.4 GW in the NEM connection queue, ~60% NSW and ~40% VIC; AEMC draft connection-standard rule for large loads due final mid-2026.

Source: AEMO / Certified Strategic โ†—
Meta runs its first non-US hyperscale campus in Sweden, on hydropower๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: high

Meta's three-building Lulea campus in northern Sweden, its first hyperscale data center outside the US, runs almost entirely on Lule River hydropower and was sited for some of the lowest, cleanest electricity in Europe. That is exactly the low-cost, low-carbon, firm-supply profile behind this rating.

Source: Meta Data Centers โ†—
Meta's Lulea hyperscale campus runs on northern-Sweden hydropower๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden North (Lulea, SE1/SE2) โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: high

Meta's three-building Lulea campus, its first hyperscale data center outside the US, runs almost entirely on Lule River hydropower with some of the lowest, cleanest power in Europe, confirming the cheap, clean, firm profile that makes this the lowest all-in market we compile.

Source: Meta Data Centers โ†—
Stargate UAE: a 5 GW Abu Dhabi AI campus, the largest outside the US, begins build-out๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: high

G42, OpenAI, Oracle, Nvidia and SoftBank are building Stargate UAE, a 1 GW compute cluster inside a 5 GW UAE-US AI campus in Abu Dhabi, with the first 200 MW targeted for 2026, powered by nuclear, solar and gas. A build of this scale confirms the abundant firm power and pro-build stance behind the Tier 1 rating.

Source: OpenAI โ†—
Eskom passes one year with zero load-shedding๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa โ†’
Jun 2026AvailabilityMateriality: med

A full year without load-shedding reached 16 May 2026 (now 406 consecutive days); unplanned outages down ~3.5 GW year-on-year and the winter outlook projects continued stability. Updates the prior 231-day entry.

Source: SAnews / Eskom โ†—
Dutch court upholds TenneT waiting list for a 70 MW data centre connection๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands โ†’
Apr 2026AccessMateriality: med

A court ruled (29 Apr 2026) that TenneT may keep Goodman's 70 MW Haarlemmermeer data centre on the congestion waiting list, finding grid public interest outweighs the developer's claim; grid-only connection near Amsterdam stays effectively closed.

Source: NL Times โ†—
Seattle enacts a one-year data-centre siting moratorium๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Pacific Northwest โ†’
Jun 2026AccessMateriality: low

Seattle City Council passed a one-year moratorium on siting data centres above 20 MVA (Jun 2026) pending a study of grid, land-use and ratepayer impacts.

Source: Seattle City Light โ†—
Stargate Norway: Nscale and Aker to build a ~230 MW hydro-powered AI data center in Narvik, OpenAI's first in Europe๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway โ†’
Jul 2025MomentumMateriality: high

Nscale and Aker announced Stargate Norway, OpenAI's first dedicated AI data center in Europe, sited in Narvik to run on Norwegian hydropower, starting around 230 MW with room to expand. Google is separately building its first Norwegian data center in Skien. Builds of this scale confirm the cheap, clean, firm hydropower profile behind the rating.

Source: TechCrunch โ†—
Hydro-Quebec proposes a ~13 cents/kWh data-centre tariff๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec โ†’
Jun 2026Cost / AccessMateriality: med

A new large-load rate for sites over 5 MW, roughly double the current large-power rate, pending Regie de l'energie approval for H2 2026.

Source: Hydro-Quebec / CBC โ†—
PJM's reopened, reformed queue draws 220 GW in its first cycle๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Apr 2026AccessMateriality: med

811 projects (106 GW gas, 67 GW storage) under the first-ready, first-served reform, which aims to speed connections in the world's largest market.

Source: PJM Inside Lines โ†—
TNB's new RP4 tariff raises data-center electricity bills roughly 10 to 14%๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia โ†’
2025CostMateriality: med

The voltage-based RP4 tariff (from July 2025) shifts more network and capacity cost onto high-voltage users like data centers, raising bills an estimated 10 to 14% before surcharges. Rising power cost is the main argument against the rating, a real headwind even as momentum stays strong.

Source: Data centers brace for higher bills (w.media) โ†—
South Korea plans an 18.4 GW national AI data-center build-out by 2035๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: high

The government's plan targets 18.4 GW of AI data-center capacity by 2035, about KRW 550 trillion in the first phase, deliberately spread to regions like Chungcheong and Ulsan to relieve Seoul-area congestion. Momentum on this scale confirms Korea is a serious large-load market, the basis for the rating.

Source: Light Reading โ†—
Microsoft builds a Finnish data-center region, recycling server heat into district heating๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: med

Microsoft is developing a southern-Finland data-center region across Espoo, Kirkkonummi and Vihti, with a Fortum partnership to reuse server heat as district heating for tens of thousands of homes, one of the world's largest such schemes, and has secured land near Vaasa for a second site. Sustained hyperscale investment confirms the clean, low-cost, reliable profile behind the rating.

Source: Microsoft News Centre Europe โ†—
Ireland lifts the Dublin data-centre connection moratorium, with conditions๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland (Dublin) โ†’
Dec 2025AccessMateriality: high

New grid links are allowed only for projects that can self-generate or store their full demand; grid-only connection stays effectively closed in the east.

Source: Energy Connects โ†—
PJM capacity auction clears at the price cap with a 6.6 GW reliability shortfall๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM) โ†’
Dec 2025CostMateriality: high

The 2027/28 Base Residual Auction (17 Dec 2025) cleared the whole footprint at the FERC-approved cap of $333.44/MW-day, the first auction where the entire RTO fell short of the reliability requirement; PJM attributes ~5,100 MW of forecast load growth to data centers.

Source: PJM Inside Lines โ†—
ERCOT large-load requests reach ~233 GW, roughly 4x year-on-year๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas) โ†’
Dec 2025Momentum / AvailabilityMateriality: med

Over 70% from data centers; ERCOT models ~138 GW of large loads by 2030, the demand side now racing as fast as supply. Demand at this scale choosing Texas confirms the cheap, fast-to-connect profile behind the strong rating.

Source: ERCOT โ†—
Malaysia approves about RM144 billion across 143 data-center projects, led by the Johor cluster๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: high

From 2021 to mid-2025 Malaysia approved 143 data-center projects worth nearly RM144 billion, concentrated in Johor next to Singapore, where the pipeline runs to multiple gigawatts. Momentum on this scale confirms Malaysia as Southeast Asia's leading large-load destination, the basis for the rating.

Source: KAAP Law โ†—
DayOne signs Indonesia's largest power deal, about 450 MW, for a Batam data center๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia โ†’
2026MomentumMateriality: high

DayOne signed a roughly 450 MW (511 MVA) grid-power deal with PT PLN Batam, Indonesia's largest, with phased delivery from 2026 to 2027, part of a Batam-Nongsa cluster with two sites live, three under construction and eight more announced. Momentum on this scale confirms Indonesia as a rising large-load market.

Source: w.media โ†—
Thailand approves 36 data-center projects worth about 728 billion baht in 2025, plus a $5B AWS region๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: high

The Board of Investment approved 36 data-center projects worth roughly 728 billion baht in 2025, and AWS opened a $5 billion Thailand region with three availability zones. Momentum of this scale confirms Thailand as Southeast Asia's leading large-load magnet, the basis for the rating.

Source: Bangkok Post โ†—
The Philippines targets about 18 GW of new data-center capacity, with 1.5 GW online by 2027๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines โ†’
2026MomentumMateriality: high

From roughly 500 MW across 28 colocation facilities in early 2026, the DICT is targeting about 18 GW of additional data-center capacity over the next decade and 1.5 GW by 2027. Ambition on this scale confirms real large-load momentum, the upside behind the rating.

Source: Filipino Engineer โ†—
Hong Kong utilities report about 99.999% supply reliability as data-centre demand grows๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong โ†’
2025AvailabilityMateriality: med

CLP reports about 99.999% supply reliability, roughly 2.6 minutes of unplanned outage a year, and both utilities say they hold adequate capacity and backup. That is a strong local delivery record on the utility's own published measure, and a real strength for a large load, even as high cost and land scarcity constrain the rating. It describes distribution performance, not the terms of a firm service contract.

Source: CLP โ†—
About half of Greater Seoul data-center projects in 2024-2025 were delayed or scrapped๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea โ†’
2025AccessMateriality: med

Roughly 17 of 33 permitted data-center projects in the greater Seoul area over 2024-2025 were delayed or cancelled, largely on grid congestion and local opposition. That is the access constraint behind the Tier 3 call and the push to regional siting.

Source: Seoulz โ†—
14,000-plus businesses now on the Dutch grid-connection waiting list๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands โ†’
Oct 2025AccessMateriality: high

Quoted waits reach up to 10 years and whole regions are full for the decade; connection, not generation, is the binding constraint.

Source: NL Times โ†—
TMO4+ connection reform goes live, reordering a ~96 GW queue๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain โ†’
2025AccessMateriality: med

A first-ready, first-connected overhaul targets historic waits of up to 15 years; projects aiming for 2030 should have offers by early 2026.

Source: NESO โ†—
TNB's Green Lane cuts data-center connection times toward 12 months, backed by RM43 billion of grid investment๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia โ†’
2025AccessMateriality: med

TNB's Green Lane pathway aims to shorten data-center power connections to about 12 months from the usual 36 to 48, and the utility is investing around RM43 billion to upgrade the grid. Fast, funded connection is the access strength behind the rating, even as concentrated demand strains capacity.

Source: w.media โ†—
Analysts warn Batam power-connection queues could reach 24 months without grid upgrades๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia โ†’
2025AvailabilityMateriality: med

Rapid hyperscale growth is straining Batam's generation and transmission, with warnings that connection-queue delays could reach 24 months without coordinated upgrades, and grids outside Java often lack hyperscale-grade reliability. That is the availability and access risk behind the Tier 3 call.

Source: PetroRaya Resources โ†—
EGAT commits tens of billions of baht to upgrade transmission for data centres๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand โ†’
2025AccessMateriality: med

EGAT is investing about 31 billion baht, with further tranches, to upgrade transmission, because the Eastern Economic Corridor grid was built for conventional industry, not concentrated hyperscale load. That transmission gap is the access constraint behind the Tier 3 call.

Source: The Nation โ†—
The Luzon grid logged 14 yellow and 3 red alerts in the 2024 dry season๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines โ†’
2025AvailabilityMateriality: high

Thin reserve margins left the Luzon grid issuing 14 yellow and 3 red alerts during the 2024 dry season, and a 2025 yellow alert with just 659 MW of reserve. That fragility is the availability risk behind the Tier 4 call, and why provincial reliability lags Metro Manila.

Source: Philstar โ†—
Government builds a 3,000-petaflop AI Supercomputing Centre and upgrades the Northern Metropolis grid๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: low

Hong Kong is standing up a government AI Supercomputing Centre and CLP is upgrading the Northern Metropolis grid for kilowatt-density AI load, real but modest momentum on a small, land-constrained system.

Source: Developing data centres in Hong Kong (HK Government) โ†—
India adds a record 41 GW of renewables; data-centre capacity tops 1.5 GW๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India โ†’
2025Momentum / CarbonMateriality: med

Power demand growing ~7% a year and $30B of data-center investment committed, with renewables raising the clean share.

Source: CREA / IBEF โ†—
Barakah nuclear reaches ~23% of UAE generation๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates โ†’
2025Carbon / AvailabilityMateriality: med

The completed plant cleans the grid and adds firm, low-carbon baseload as the sovereign-AI build accelerates.

Source: The National โ†—
South Africa runs 231 consecutive days without load-shedding๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa โ†’
2025AvailabilityMateriality: med

Eskom's energy-availability factor is recovering, a major reliability turnaround from the 2023 crisis.

Source: Eskom โ†—
Ontario Bill 40 introduces prioritized large data-centre connections๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ontario โ†’
2025AccessMateriality: med

The Act lets the Minister prioritize and approve large data-centre connections by economic benefit; approved projects proceed, new ones face selection.

Source: Torys โ†—
AESO sets an interim large-load connection limit amid an AI surge๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Alberta โ†’
2025AccessMateriality: med

A temporary cap on new large-load connections while AESO designs a durable framework for a wave of data-center interest.

Source: AESO โ†—
Atlanta reaches ~2 GW under construction๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US Southeast (Atlanta) โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: low

The US Southeast is now a top-three North American market by build, with Southern Company adding gas and solar.

Source: CBRE โ†—
Phoenix overtakes Dallas and Silicon Valley on inventory๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Desert Southwest (Phoenix) โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: low

The Desert Southwest is now one of the fastest-growing US data-center markets on land, solar and a pro-build posture.

Source: CBRE โ†—
Saudi sovereign-AI programs (Humain, DataVolt) scale compute demand๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia โ†’
2025MomentumMateriality: low

State-backed AI infrastructure accelerates power demand on the cheapest-tier grid in the set.

Source: DCD โ†—
Material, cited grid developments across rated markets, newest first. Each is tagged to the market and the pillar it bears on and can trigger a rating review.

Latest rating actions

Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany: National score moves 57 to 53 as the overview now carries the average of its regions' reliability adjustments (North 0, South 7) instead of an unapplied national dock. Tier 3 affirmed; the region ratings are unchanged and remain the actionable ones.
Trigger: Overview reliability-adjustment consistency (methodology note, Jul 2026)
Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden: National score moves 78 to 76 as the overview now carries the average of its regions' reliability adjustments (North 0, South 4) instead of an unapplied national dock. Tier 1 affirmed; the region ratings are unchanged.
Trigger: Overview reliability-adjustment consistency (methodology note, Jul 2026)
Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan: National score moves 51 to 47 as the overview now carries the average of its regions' reliability adjustments (East 7, West 0) instead of an unapplied national dock. Tier 3 affirmed; the region ratings are unchanged.
Trigger: Overview reliability-adjustment consistency (methodology note, Jul 2026)
Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM): A second consecutive capacity auction at the price cap confirms the structural cost pressure already reflected in the tier. Tier holds.
Trigger: 2028/29 BRA clears at the $325/MW-day cap with a 6.8 GW shortfall, 14 Jul 2026
Jul 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM): A statewide $0.011/kWh consumption tax stacks on capacity prices at the cap and DOE-ordered curtailment exposure; direction of the Cost pillar is clearly negative, tier impact under assessment.
Trigger: Virginia data-center electricity tax effective 1 Jul 2026
Jul 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM): Two high-materiality negatives in one cycle: capacity cleared at the cap with a first-ever RTO-wide 6.6 GW reliability shortfall (Cost, Availability), and emergency authority to curtail data centers as a class (Availability, with Access read-through). Review continues; direction uncertain until the 2028/29 auction clears, tier could hold or move down one notch.
Trigger: 2027/28 BRA shortfall at cap (17 Dec 2025) plus DOE 202(c) large-load curtailment order (30 Jun 2026); 2028/29 BRA results due 14 Jul 2026
Jun 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM): FERC's preliminary finding that PJM's tariff is unjust for large loads puts co-location and cost-allocation economics directly in play; direction uncertain pending the 60-day response and any rulemaking. Tier held for now, flagged for review.
Trigger: FERC Section 206 show-cause order (18 Jun 2026)
Aug 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM): Tier holds. The 22 Jul event caused no reliability impact and the sites behaved as designed, but the scale doubled versus 2024 and the correlated behaviour of a whole cluster is now a planning input rather than customer behaviour. Taken with the FERC direction to NERC, this confirms rather than changes the Availability call: dense, strained, and increasingly governed by rules written specifically for it. The market remains under review on the separate cost grounds already logged.
Trigger: 3 GW-plus data center load transfer after the Ashburn line fault, 22 Jul 2026; FERC Docket RD26-7, 16 Jul 2026
Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ MISO (Midwest): Emergency procedures managed the heat dome without reported firm load shed. Consistent with the thin-margin availability profile already in the rating. Tier holds.
Trigger: Maximum generation emergency at ~122 GW demand, 15 Jul 2026
Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ MISO (Midwest): Tier holds. The 35% load-growth forecast confirms demand momentum without changing near-term access or availability.
Trigger: MISO long-term load forecast, 13 Apr 2026
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ MISO (Midwest): Named in the FERC show-cause suite; reform process is preliminary and procedural. Tier holds, monitoring the 17 Aug response.
Trigger: FERC Section 206 show-cause order (18 Jun 2026)
Aug 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ MISO (Midwest): Tier holds. The commission was explicit that this is a procedural reset rather than a rejection, and the underlying project is still expected. It does illustrate the state-level siting risk behind data-center-driven transmission in MISO, where the delivery path runs through a state commission that can restart the clock.
Trigger: PSC of Wisconsin rescinds the ATC completeness determination, 6 Aug 2026
Aug 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ SPP (Southwest Power Pool): Tier holds. The cancelled corridors were proposals, never designated, and SPP large-load access does not depend on federal backstop siting. Marginal negative for long-haul transmission optionality across the footprint, not a pillar move.
Trigger: DOE cancellation of three proposed National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors, 12 Aug 2026
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ SPP (Southwest Power Pool): Named in the FERC show-cause suite; preliminary stage, tier holds, monitoring.
Trigger: FERC Section 206 show-cause order (18 Jun 2026)
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ CAISO (California): Named in the FERC show-cause suite; preliminary stage, tier holds, monitoring.
Trigger: FERC Section 206 show-cause order (18 Jun 2026)
Jul 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ CAISO (California): The Cost pillar (currently 68) is placed under review. California's wholesale price badly understates the delivered cost once non-bypassable charges, the Power Charge Indifference Adjustment, delivery, and Rule 30 upfront transmission are counted; a large load's all-in runs closer to $95 to $155 per MWh, an expensive market, not a moderate one. Reassessing the Cost score; tier could move down as the cost read weakens.
Trigger: Realized-cost review of California non-bypassable and delivery charges (Jul 2026)
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates: Tier 1 Prime affirmed on abundant firm gas capacity, an open pro-build stance, and a strong national AI-power agenda.
Trigger: National AI and data-centre build-out (2026)
Jul 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates: The Cost pillar (currently 90) is placed under review. The figure reflected the cheap-gas generation cost, not the delivered tariff: EtihadWE's large-load and data-centre incentive rate is about 26 to 32 fils per kWh (roughly $70 to $90 per MWh), which is mid-pack globally, not among the cheapest. Reassessing the Cost score, which may ease; because the Prime rating leans partly on cost, the Tier 1 status is being re-examined.
Trigger: Realized-cost review of the EtihadWE large-load tariff (Jul 2026)
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ISO New England: Named in the FERC show-cause suite; preliminary stage, tier holds, monitoring.
Trigger: FERC Section 206 show-cause order (18 Jun 2026)
Jul 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NYISO (New York): A statewide permit pause at 50 MW+ is a direct hit to Access in force today. Duration and the shape of the successor framework are unclear; tier direction uncertain pending the state's rules.
Trigger: Executive order imposing a statewide data-center moratorium, 14 Jul 2026
Jun 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NYISO (New York): A statewide 20 MW+ moratorium is one signature from law and would tighten access materially on top of the FERC order. Tier held pending the Governor's decision; downgrade path if signed.
Trigger: NY Legislature data-centre moratorium passed (4 Jun 2026); FERC Section 206 order (18 Jun 2026)
Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas): Tier holds. Formal PUCT approval of Batch Zero adds regulatory certainty to large-load access; queue discipline supports, not weakens, the rating.
Trigger: PUCT approval of Batch Zero, 18 Jun 2026
Jul 2026
Downgrade๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas): Under the v2 reliability overlay, ERCOT is held at Tier 2. Fundamentals remain strong (78) and connect-and-manage energization is still the fastest large-load path in the US, but a NERC elevated-risk forward outlook plus the Winter Storm Uri record cap it below Prime.
Trigger: Methodology v2 reliability overlay; NERC 2024 Long-Term Reliability Assessment elevated-risk finding
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas): Large-load demand surge reviewed; fast connect-and-manage energization and cheap self-supply gas keep the fundamentals strong.
Trigger: ERCOT large-load requests reach ~233 GW (Dec 2025)
Aug 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas): Tier not moved, but the connection pathway that underpins the Access score is paused with no stated end date. A verification gate applied to every data center large load, layered on Batch Zero, is a material change in how fast a large load can reach energization in the market we score as the fastest in the US. Direction is genuinely uncertain: a short verification exercise leaves the tier intact, a durable screening regime does not. Resolve after the PUCT open meeting on 20 Aug 2026.
Trigger: Gov. Abbott directive and ERCOT market notice M-A080326-01, 3 Aug 2026; missed Batch Zero classification date, 7 Aug 2026
Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec: Tier holds. The tariff is still a proposal and its in-force date has slipped; no change until the Regie rules.
Trigger: Regie hearing timing update, Jul 2026
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec: Proposed data-centre tariff reviewed; this is managed pricing inside an open, low-cost system, not a closure. Price remains the lowest in the set; Tier 2 affirmed, outlook unchanged.
Trigger: Hydro-Quebec ~13 cents/kWh tariff proposal (Jun 2026)
Jul 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec: The Cost pillar (currently 100) is placed under review. On closer analysis, the proposed dedicated data-centre rate of about 13 cents CAD per kWh (roughly $95 US per MWh) puts Quebec mid-pack for a new data center rather than lowest in the set; the cheap Rate L (about 3.8 cents) applies to general industry, not to the load we rate. Reassessing whether the Cost score overstates the advantage for a new data center. Tier likely holds; the Cost pillar may ease.
Trigger: Realized-cost review of the Hydro-Quebec data-centre tariff (Jul 2026)
Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Alberta: BYOG gives large loads a defined, if conditional, connection path after the interim tranche filled. Constructive for Access but untested until the first intake. Tier holds.
Trigger: Data Centre Regulation AR 117/2026 and AESO proposed BYOG process, Jun-Jul 2026
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Alberta: Interim tranche fully subscribed with no durable Phase 2 framework yet is a near-term access constraint, but gas-rich, pro-build fundamentals hold the tier. Affirmed; outlook watch if Phase 2 slips.
Trigger: AESO Phase 1 fully allocated (12 Jun 2026)
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain: Connection reform is delivering on schedule (Gate 2 offers issuing), supporting the positive outlook, but firm pre-2030 capacity stays scarce. Tier affirmed, outlook unchanged.
Trigger: NESO Gate 2 offers for pre-2030 projects (Jun 2026)
Aug 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain: Tier holds. The proposal is a consultation, not in force, and it cuts both ways: a refundable fee of up to GBP 712,500 per MW is a real balance-sheet demand on a credible developer, but the intent is to strip a 125 GW queue of projects that were never going to connect, which is what a serious large load needs. Revisit on the final decision after 16 Sep 2026; a fee at the top of the range with weak refund mechanics would be an Access negative.
Trigger: Ofgem consultation on data centre connection reforms, 29 Jul 2026
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia (NEM): Queue disclosure and a maturing AEMC connection standard improve transparency and revealed build. Tier affirmed, positive outlook supported.
Trigger: AEMO 5.4 GW queue disclosure (Jun 2026)
Aug 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia (NEM): Tier holds for now. The obligation is advice, not law, with federal legislation targeted for early 2027 and AEMC implementation estimates of 12 months for the REGO obligation and 24 to 36 months for registration and connection reform. Direction is clear even if timing is not: a large load in the NEM will have to fund new generation and firming rather than draw on existing supply, which raises the all-in cost of siting here and tightens Access. NSW moving first with REZ-style access control sharpens that.
Trigger: AEMC advice to the ECMC 28 Jul 2026, released 5 Aug 2026; NSW Electricity Infrastructure Investment Amendment Bill 2026, 5 Aug 2026
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Pacific Northwest: Seattle's siting moratorium is consistent with the existing negative outlook; localised, not system-wide. Tier affirmed.
Trigger: Seattle data-centre moratorium (Jun 2026)
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa: The availability-recovery upgrade trigger set previously is now met: a full year without load-shedding. Tier affirmed; recommend a formal upgrade review next cycle if reliability holds through winter.
Trigger: One year with zero load-shedding (16 May 2026)
Jun 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa: Reliability recovery reviewed; a sustained run without load-shedding supports the availability read. Tier affirmed, with an upgrade trigger if the recovery holds.
Trigger: 231 consecutive days without load-shedding (2025)
Aug 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa: Tier holds. A 441 day run and a daily EAF of 82.04%, the best since 2017, extend a recovery the rating already reflects and keep the previously set upgrade trigger live. We would want sustained performance through a full summer peak before treating this as grounds for an upgrade.
Trigger: Eskom performance update, 4 Aug 2026
Jun 2026
Under review๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland (Dublin): The connection-moratorium lift is placed under review. Whether conditional, self-supply connections materially reopen access is being assessed; direction uncertain, with an upgrade path if access genuinely improves.
Trigger: Ireland lifts the Dublin moratorium with conditions (Dec 2025)
Jul 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands: Court ruling hardens the connection constraint the tier already prices in; tier holds.
Trigger: Haarlemmermeer waiting-list ruling (29 Apr 2026)
Aug 2026
Affirmed๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India: Tier holds. The revision roughly doubles the government's own view of data centre load by FY32 and is a Momentum positive, but it is a projection from state-reported projects, not built capacity, and the ministry itself flags grid balancing under sharp load ramps. Confirms the direction already in the rating rather than grounds to move it.
Trigger: Ministry of Power statement to Parliament, 27 Jul 2026
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT (Texas): New rating: assigned, split into West and Central sub-regions.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT West (West Texas & Panhandle): New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned (ERCOT West sub-region).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ERCOT Central (Houston & DFW): New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned (ERCOT Central sub-region).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates: New rating: Tier 1 Prime assigned (carbon-sensitive).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned (light policy override).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Northern Virginia (PJM): New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned (momentum override).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US Southeast (Atlanta): New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway: New rating: Tier 1 Prime assigned (Tier 2 on pillar score, lifted into the reliability-adjusted Prime window on reviewed delivery reliability and forward adequacy).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ontario: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Pacific Northwest: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil (Sao Paulo): New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned (low confidence).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (north/south split noted).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany North (Hamburg): New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (northern zone of Germany).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany South (Frankfurt/Munich): New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned (southern zone of Germany).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland (Dublin): New rating: Tier 5 Largely closed assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Desert Southwest (Phoenix): New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ SPP (Southwest Power Pool): New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ MISO (Midwest): New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ CAISO (California): New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NYISO (New York): New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ISO New England: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ British Columbia: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned (borderline Tier 1).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Manitoba: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Alberta: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Newfoundland & Labrador: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (corrected from a naive surplus read).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saskatchewan: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ New Brunswick: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Nova Scotia: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned (borderline Tier 1).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden North (Lulea, SE1/SE2): New rating: Tier 1 Prime assigned (northern zones SE1/SE2).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden South (Malmo, SE4): New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (southern zone SE4).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czech Republic: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy (Milan, North): New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned (momentum noted, no up-override).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned (carbon-sensitive).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar: New rating: Tier 2 Strong assigned (carbon-sensitive).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (low confidence).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (carbon-sensitive).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkey: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (low confidence).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Uruguay: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (low confidence).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan East (Tokyo, 50Hz): New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned (eastern 50Hz grid).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan West (Osaka, 60Hz): New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (western 60Hz grid).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand: New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia (NEM): New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia NSW (Sydney): New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (New South Wales).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia Victoria (Melbourne): New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned (Victoria).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia Queensland (Brisbane): New rating: Tier 3 Workable assigned (Queensland).
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
June 2026
New rating๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore: New rating: Tier 4 Constrained assigned.
Q3 2026 ratings release โ†’ See the full track record โ†’